Any of these sound familiar.
The EU AI Act applies to you and the August 2026 GPAI deadline is real — but you can't show per-system evidence.
You're pursuing ISO/IEC 42001 and can't tell the management-system paperwork from per-system product proof.
A customer or board asked “prove our AI is controlled” — and you had to assemble it by hand.
What “solved” looks like.
Compliance that's continuous and defensible — not a document you rebuild every audit cycle.
Every in-scope AI system carries a readiness score, mapped controls, and its obligations.
A live evidence library you can hand an auditor — not a spreadsheet scramble.
A defensible answer to the regulator and the board, kept current as the estate changes.
Four modules, one compounding flow.
Discover what's in scope, govern it, and produce the evidence — each step feeds the next.
Enterprise AI Assessment
Scores your readiness and scopes the estate.
AI Discovery
Finds the AI systems in scope, including shadow AI.
AI Governance
Controls, risk, obligations, ownership, evidence.
AuditAI
Immutable evidence each system is controlled.
COMPOUNDS: DISCOVER → GOVERN → EVIDENCE
The deliverables, per AI system.
Real product surfaces — populated with your estate, not our demo data.
Per framework: EU AI Act · ISO 42001 · NIST.
Coverage view plus a prioritised gap list.
Every obligation, per AI system.
Audit-ready, and kept current.
Who signs, and who uses it.
Compliance that survives a budget review.
Governance suites prove compliance but can't price it. TrustedAIGov ties each governed system to its cost — and to cost-per-successful-task — so when finance asks what compliance is worth, you have the answer in the same platform that proves it.
See the full Why TrustedAIGov page →